There's also a very disturbing element around creating the idea that when women say "no," they don't really mean it and you can keep pushing even to the point of violence with the "women" who say they don't want to be puppies and need to be "zapped" into submission. So we've gone from #metoo being a needed correction to an over correction to "let's celebrate forcing yourself on a 'woman' who says no?"
Nothing from Routledge surprises me any more. What is surprising is that the article is in the category "Research Article" rather than something subjective like "Opinion". Maybe I'm showing my hard-science bias...
There's also a very disturbing element around creating the idea that when women say "no," they don't really mean it and you can keep pushing even to the point of violence with the "women" who say they don't want to be puppies and need to be "zapped" into submission. So we've gone from #metoo being a needed correction to an over correction to "let's celebrate forcing yourself on a 'woman' who says no?"
Furries have long attempted to recruit children by using cute imagery such as avatars of young animals. See the Aimee Challenor case for one example.
Nothing from Routledge surprises me any more. What is surprising is that the article is in the category "Research Article" rather than something subjective like "Opinion". Maybe I'm showing my hard-science bias...